Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Population-based cancer registry study reveals SPM risks in multiple myeloma patients treated with lenalidomide, indicating potential diagnostic bias.
An increased risk of SPM (second primary malignancies) was reported for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma transplant ineligible (NDMM-TI) exposed to lenalidomide (Len), with the caveats that Len was often co-exposed to alkylating-agents and the studies did not exclude SyM (synchronous malignancies). We aimed to evaluate the respective SyM over SPM risks in NDMM-TI treated in front-line with Len. We conducted a high-resolution population-based cancer registry study, which allowed completeness of the primary endpoint (SyM and SPM) without reporting bias, and to guarantee a cohort more representative of real-life than clinical trials. The inclusion period started recently (2018) due to the reimbursement of Len in France. Additional malignancies (AdM) diagnosed ≤4 months after MM diagnosis was defined as a SyM, and >4 months an SPM. The person-year approach was used with an indirect standardization. With a median follow-up of 36 months [95%CI 40-44], 360 consecutive NDMM-TI were identified, including 174 treated with Len. In total, 35 (9.7%) patients had an AdM (SIR 2.17 [95%CI 1.51-3.02]), 16 (4.4%) had a SyM (SIR 8.20 [95%CI 4.68-13.31]) and 19 (6.4%) patients had a SPM (SIR 1.15 [95%CI 0.69-1.79]). For NDMM-TI treated with Len, 12 (6.9%) had a SPM (SIR 1.28 [95%CI 0.66-2.23]) and cumulative incidence was 3.6% at 3 years [95%CI 1.5-7.2%]. NDMM-TI have a high-risk of being co-diagnosed with a SyM possibly explained by exams performed at MM diagnosis. NDMM-TI treated with Len, never exposed to conventional chemotherapy, did not seem to have an increased risk of SPM compared with the general population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Systchenko et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: