Cross-sectional survey shows high patient satisfaction with surgical care practitioners performing minor surgery under local anaesthetic, implying their effectiveness.
Aim To explore patient opinions on the acceptability of SCPs performing minor surgery under local anaesthetic. Background Surgical Care Practitioners (SCPs) are experienced registered healthcare professionals who complete specialised training approved by the Surgical Royal Colleges. Their role addresses healthcare service demands by assisting consultant-led operating lists and supporting junior doctor training in accordance with the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum. SCPs can also undertake delegated surgical activities, including minor procedures under local anaesthetic. The Trust has had a dedicated SCP team for 15 years. Between 2016 and 2025, 604 patients underwent minor surgery on the SCP theatre list. Method A cross-sectional survey was conducted. Questionnaires were distributed to patients who underwent minor surgery (e.g., excision of benign lesions) between 1st January 2024 and 1st January 2025. Results At total of 162 excision were performed, 68 sebaceous cyst, 86 lipomas and 11 skin tags. 126 patients invited to participate, 91 responded (72%). Among respondents, 65% were aware the SCP was performing their procedure. Patient satisfaction was high, with 96% happy with their treatment, and 97% willing to have future procedures performed by an SCP. Only 3.2% reported post-procedure infections requiring antibiotics. Conclusion The evaluation indicates that minor surgery performed by SCPs under local anaesthetic is safe and achieves high patient satisfaction with low complication rates. This highlights the value of SCPs in meeting service demands while maintaining quality care. However, the importance of prioritising junior doctor training in minor surgery remains critical to ensure future workforce competency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carvell et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: