Quality improvement project standardises data collection and improves satisfaction in breast surgery departments.
Aims This quality improvement project aimed to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of Mortality and Morbidity (M&M) meetings in the Breast Surgery department at an academic tertiary centre. The goal was to standardise the M&M process, addressing challenges related to data collection inefficiencies and time constraints in a busy clinical environment. Methods A standardised Excel spreadsheet with automated coding was developed to capture all relevant M&M data. A PowerPoint template was also created to present this data clearly, in line with GIRFT (Getting It Right First Time) performance benchmarks. A formalised handover process for new resident doctors was introduced, including a step-by-step guide on data tracking, administrative contacts, and resource use. The Excel sheet was made accessible for real-time prospective data entry via a shared drive, and M&M meeting dates were communicated at least six weeks in advance. Results Standardising the data collection process improved accuracy and efficiency of the M&M process. Resident doctors reported higher satisfaction, as prospective data entry reduced errors and saved time. Additionally, the system proved easily replicable, offering a model that could be implemented in other departments. Conclusions The standardised tools introduced enabled more efficient, accurate, and repeatable data collection. The step-by-step guide and PowerPoint template offered a reproducible framework for other departments. This quality improvement initiative demonstrated that standardising the M&M process can enhance surgical practice, lead to higher user satisfaction and stronger clinical governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalakouti et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: