Non‐Contrastive Transcendence and What Good Theology Looks Like

Kathryn Tanner's grammatical framing of non‐contrastive transcendence in God and Creation is part of what makes it such a powerful and valuable theological contribution, and distinguishes what she develops in this book from the systematic proposals unfolded in her later volumes. The essays gathered in this issue interact with Tanner's proposals, and with one another, in varied and interesting ways. They bring to the fore, among other things, the importance of distinguishing between the argument of God and Creation and its subsequent reception, and the central significance which Tanner's casting of evil as intrinsically unintelligible has in her work.