Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative analysis uncovers key factors affecting student motivation in cross-disciplinary courses, highlighting autonomy and competence.
There is a growing interest in cross-disciplinary education aimed at instilling an open mindset in students in order to help them navigate complex societal issues. Since this requires commitment to learning, self-reflection, and venturing out of the “known,” it is essential to understand student motivation for this type of learning that goes beyond traditional academic pursuits. This article explores first-year students’ motivation in the Broader Mind Course (BMC) at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU). By drawing on qualitative interview data (n=23) of all actors involved—students, teachers, course designers, and management—we explore what elements support or impede participation, using self-determination theory as a lens. The results show that a balance between organisational guidance and freedom of choice should be ensured (autonomy), traditional external incentives and scaffolding are needed (competence), and educators should create a secure atmosphere (relatedness). The results of this study provide useful insights for the development of innovative and engaging cross-disciplinary courses for students’ personal, social, and academic development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demeijer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: