Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis explores how test-optional policies affect admissions decisions and enhance diversity, indicating a response to social pressure.
Many US colleges now use test-optional admissions. A frequent claim is that by not seeing standardized test scores, a college can admit a student body it prefers, say, with more diversity. But how can observing less information improve decisions? This paper proposes that test-optional policies are a response to social pressure on admission decisions. We model a college that bears disutility when it makes admission decisions that “society” dislikes. Going test optional allows the college to reduce its “disagreement cost.” We analyze how missing scores are imputed and the consequences for the college, students, and society. (JEL I23, I28)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dessein et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: