This analysis examines the effects of test-optional policies on retention and graduation rates, indicating nuanced impacts based on institutional selectivity.
This study examines the relationship between test-optional undergraduate admissions policies and two common student success metrics: the retention rate for first-year students and the 6-year graduation rate for bachelor’s students. Using a difference-in-differences analytic approach designed to account for the staggered nature of policy adoption, I find that test-optional policies adopted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic were not associated with statistically significant changes in institution-level retention and graduation rates overall. However, subgroup analyses by institutional selectivity indicate that test-optional policy enactment was associated with a 2 percentage point increase in graduation rates for men, women, and White students at institutions with more competitive admissions but a 2 percentage point decrease in graduation rates for White students at institutions with less competitive admissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher Bennett (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: