Observational study shows connected insulin pens enhance glycaemic outcomes in diabetes management, suggesting potential benefits from combined support.
Aims This observational study investigated changes in glycaemic control in people living with diabetes after initiating a connected insulin pen to administer their bolus insulin in routine clinical practice. Materials and methods Data were collected from adults (≥18 years) with insulin‐treated diabetes who were using a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device and started administering bolus insulin using a connected insulin pen. Key glycaemic outcomes were time in range (TIR; 3.9–10.0 mmol/L), time above range (TAR; >10.0 mmol/L), and time below range (TBR; <3.9 and <3.0 mmol/L) in the overall population and for subgroups by country and by baseline TIR for individuals with 3 months of baseline CGM data. Results Data were included from 86 133 individuals with a mean (standard deviation) age of 43.7 (15.7) years. There were small but statistically significant increases from baseline in TIR at month 3 (1.5%‐points), month 6 (1.4%‐points) and month 12 (1.1%‐points), and statistically significant decreases from baseline in TAR and TBR (<3.9 and <3.0 mmol/L) at month 3, month 6 and month 12. Increases in TIR were largest for those with the lowest baseline TIR (3‐month baseline average of <40% TIR). Increases in TIR were largest in Austria, with an increase in TIR of 4.7% at month 3. Conclusions These real‐world data show that glycaemic outcomes improved after connected insulin pen initiation, especially in individuals with the highest unmet need (i.e., lowest baseline TIR). Combining a connected insulin pen with additional support, such as app‐based training or education, may further improve glycaemic control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adolfsson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: