Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis reveals patient satisfaction levels for the social health security scheme, suggesting improvement areas.
Background: Government of Nepal aims to enable its citizens to access quality health care services without placing a financial burden on them via Social Health Insurance Scheme. It is expected to reduce barriers to health-care utilization while also ensuring equity and access for low-income and disadvantaged populations in order to achieve Universal Health Coverage. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the patient's awareness, satisfaction level of Social Health Security Scheme in a Tertiary Level Hospital in Nepal. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional analytical study was conducted between September 2022 and June 2023 among 423 patients who visited the In- and Out-patient departments of Dhulikhel Hospital and were registered under the Social Health Security Scheme. The patients’ satisfaction levels were evaluated using a short version of the Patient satisfaction questionnaire. The collected data were entered into MS-excel and analyzed using STATA version 13. Results: Among the 423 evaluated respondents, the majority (26.71%) were found to have good satisfaction (90 to 66 points), and 71.87% gave average satisfaction (65 to 42 points). The highest level of satisfaction was observed in the access and convenience domain, with a mean score of 14.52 and an SD of 1.71. The mean overall satisfaction score was 57.82 and SD 3.71. There was a potential association between the number of family members and satisfaction scores. However, most demographic factors were not significantly associated with satisfaction scores. Conclusion: Awareness of health insurance schemes was high among the participants. Most participants rated their satisfaction as good, indicating a positive perception of the healthcare services provided. However, a significant proportion gave average evaluations, suggesting the need for improvements in certain areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acharya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: