Observational analysis revealed open issues in urban planning among young researchers, highlighting the need for academic feedback.
Young researchers in urban planning often struggle to find ‘safe spaces' and academic opportunities to discuss their work and receive constructive feedback. The 18th aesop Young Academics conference provided such a platform. The event, articulated around five tracks, addressed key gaps in the field of urban planning, including urban-rural dynamics, academia-practice divide, and planning for coexistence among humans, animal and natural species, and the environment. This paper shares the experience of the conference by reflecting on its conception, themes, outcomes, and legacy. The most significant outcome lies in the identification of key points and open issues that form a foundation for young researchers to tackle the growing challenges of coexistence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jreij et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: