Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 5, 2025CureusOpen Access

Comparison of Outcomes of Non-diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SVSmita VoraAEAlexander EbenezarBCBokka Krishna Chaitanya

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Prospective randomized trial compares visual outcomes and glare between diffractive and non-diffractive EDOF intraocular lenses, highlighting patient satisfaction.

Key Points

  • No significant differences in visual outcomes, contrast sensitivity, or spectacle independence were observed between Symfony and Vivity IOLs during the study.
  • Postoperative outcomes showed high satisfaction rates, with 95% of patients expressing satisfaction with their surgery across both groups.
  • Vivity IOLs provided better results regarding glare sensitivity than Symfony IOLs, with statistically significant findings on all postoperative assessment days.
  • Patients aged 40-80 with bilateral age-related cataracts underwent standardized phacoemulsification before lens implantation.

Cite This Study

Vora et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb4d196d6d5674bcd00b8bhttps://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.91413
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Outcomes of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens2013 · 178 citations
  2. 2Global estimates of visual impairment: 20102011 · 3,835 citations
  3. 3Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction2016 · 500 citations
  4. 4Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses2011 · 498 citations
  5. 5Visual outcomes of a new nondiffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens targeted for minimonovision: 3-month results of a prospective cohort study2021 · 61 citations