Evaluating cytotoxic effects of ascorbic acid on various cancer cell lines reveals significant viability reduction, suggesting ROS generation plays a vital role.
Background/Objectives: Ascorbic acid (AA)is a micronutrient with concentration-dependent anticancer properties, acting either as a reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger or inducer. Methods: Conventional redox-based assays such as MTS/MTT often overestimate cell proliferation due to AA’s interaction with tetrazolium salts, leading to increased formazan production. To overcome this limitation, we employed the Propidium Iodide Triton X-100 (PI/TX-100) assay to evaluate AA’s cytotoxic effects across a diverse panel of cancer and normal cell lines, including prostate (22Rv1, C4-2B, DU-145, LNCaP), breast (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-453), lung (A549), liver (HepG2, SK-HEP-1, Huh7), and kidney (Vero) cells. Results: AA significantly suppressed cancer cell viability compared to normal cells (RWPE1 and Vero), with the strongest effects observed in hormone receptor-positive lines. The relative sensitivity to AA followed distinct patterns within each cancer type. Mechanistically, AA-induced cell death involved ROS generation, lipid peroxidation, cell cycle arrest, ferroptosis, apoptosis, and downregulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDHK1). Conclusions: These findings further support the potential of AA as a selective anticancer agent and highlight the importance of assay choice in evaluating its therapeutic efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arunsi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: