Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic literature review identifies gaps in education research on climate change, suggesting petrocriticism can drive transformation and decarbonization.
Considering the key cause of climate-harming carbon emissions is the increased use of fossil fuels, we might expect research in education to engage in petrocriticism—a critical way of reading the world that deconstructs how fossil-fuelled cultural expectations and practices, or “petroculture,” functions in education. To trace the intersection of fossil fuels and education, this article conducts a systematic literature review of both existing and emerging scholarship, engaging in a petrocritical reading of research themes to reveal the extent to which petroculture is naturalized and/or confronted. By examining both dominant research patterns and the notable silences, we conclude by making recommendations for how education scholarship can respond to climate science and contribute to a more livable future through research that takes up (a) petrocriticism, (b) mitigation and decarbonization, and (c) transformation toward alternatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karsgaard et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: