Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines anti-colonial pedagogy within graduate courses, highlighting relationships and concepts of fort pedagogy and indigenous métissage.
Where do we learn? What are our experiences of relationships in those contexts? Could teaching a course outside activate the wâhkôhtowin imagination? Can walking begin to repair relationships? Donald suggests that it can; and yet, another of the concepts Donald discusses, that of fort pedagogy, cautions us to listen and not claim. Is it possible for me, a White descendent of European immigrants, to learn from the wâhkôhtowin imagination without re-enacting fort pedagogy? In this article, I examine possibilities for anti-colonial pedagogy as I reflect on a student’s learning experiences—my own—from my dual positionality as PhD student and English literature instructor. Thinking alongside Indigenous Métissage (Donald, 2009, 2012), fort pedagogy (Donald, 2009), and the wâhkôhtowin imagination (Donald, 2021), I examine my experiences in an innovative graduate English course taught largely outside and consider ways pedagogy can shift relationships to place and to one another.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deborah Schamuhn Kirk (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: