Mixed-methods study reveals treatment barriers in adults with alcohol use disorder and executive functioning challenges.
Background Executive functioning (EF)—the ability to plan, organize, and complete goal‐directed tasks—plays a critical role in the onset and course of alcohol use disorder (AUD). Individuals with AUD often report challenges in EF domains, such as initiating, planning, and performing key tasks, including seeking, engaging in, and adhering to treatment. While AUD treatment efficacy is well‐established, little is known about individuals' lived experiences with AUD treatment, especially among those with EF challenges. To date, no studies have explored how self‐reported EF challenges shape treatment‐seeking experiences in people with AUD using a mixed‐methods approach. This study addresses that gap. Methods We conducted a mixed‐methods study involving 30 adults seeking AUD treatment between June 2022 and June 2023. This work was part of a broader research program examining cognitive functioning in addictions within a mental health and addictions hospital in Toronto, Canada. Data collection included semistructured qualitative interviews and a standardized self‐administered EF questionnaire. Data were integrated, analyzed thematically, and narratively synthesized. Results Approximately half of participants (53%) met the threshold for EF challenges. Many described multiple prior treatment attempts, a delayed recognition of problematic alcohol use, and an incongruence between treatment expectations and experiences. Those with EF challenges described distinct barriers to care and expressed a need for additional supports, including access to psychotherapy, clearer treatment pathways and timelines, and more proactive communication and follow‐up from healthcare providers. Conclusions Individuals with AUD often experience co‐no studies have explored how self‐reported EF difficulties intersect with lived experiences of accessing AUD treatment using a mixed‐method approachoccurring mental health and EF challenges that may affect their motivation to seek treatment and shape treatment experiences and trajectories. Tailored treatment approaches that address EF challenges through enhanced support, structure, and provider communication may improve treatment engagement and outcomes among this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Russell et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: