Prospective analysis shows infrared sensors provide reliable temperature measurement in patients, suggesting they may serve as an alternative to tympanic methods.
The demand for rapid, non-contact, and reliable body temperature measurement in emergency departments is growing. Although tympanic thermometers are commonly used, limitations, including measurement errors and patient non-compliance, necessitate alternative methods. This study evaluated the clinical reliability of infrared sensors for measuring cervical carotid artery skin temperature, using the Braun ThermoScan 7 tympanic thermometer as a reference. In a prospective cross-sectional study, 520 patients aged 18–65 underwent three measurements in the carotid region using a FLIR T530 infrared sensor. Inter-method agreement was assessed via Bland-Altman analysis, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and Deming regression, with ambient temperature maintained at 20–30±1°C. Results revealed a mean difference of 0.14°C (±0.21°C) between tympanic and carotid infrared measurements, high agreement (ICC=0.93, p<0.001), and a strong linear relationship (R²=0.89). Carotid measurement time was 64% shorter than the tympanic method. Ambient temperature variations had minimal impact on accuracy (1.1% variation). Infrared sensors provide a robust alternative for non-contact, rapid, and reliable temperature measurement in emergency settings, enhancing infection control and triage efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karaman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: