Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis improves task recommendation accuracy in crowdsourcing, suggesting competition-aware algorithms enhance performance.
The explosive growth of tasks on crowdsourcing platforms has intensified information overload, making it difficult for workers to spot lucrative bids; yet mainstream recommenders inherit a user-independence assumption from e-commerce and therefore overlook the real-time competition among workers, which degrades ranking stability and accuracy. To bridge this gap, we propose the Adaptive Parameter Exponential Decay Algorithm (APAED), which first produces base relevance scores with an offline neural model and then injects a competition-aware exponential decay whose strength is jointly determined by the interquartile range of each worker’s score list (global factor) and the live bid distribution of every task (local factor). This model-agnostic adjustment explicitly quantifies competitive intensity without handcrafted features and can be paired with any backbone recommender. Experiments on a real-world dataset comprising 25,643 tasks and 19,735 workers show that APAED cuts the residual RMSE of HR@10 from 9.575×10−4 to 5.939×10−4 (−38%) and that of MRR from 2.920×10−4 to 0.736×10−4 (−75%), substantially reducing score fluctuations across epochs and consistently outperforming four strong neural baselines. These results confirm that explicitly modeling worker competition yields more accurate and stable task recommendations in crowdsourcing environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: