Analysis reveals that multi-disciplinary optimization improves efficiency in mixed-flow turbines, indicating new design possibilities.
Additive manufacturing offers new perspectives for creating complex geometries with improved design features at lower cost and with reduced manufacturing time. It may even become possible to print a micro-turbojet engine in one single print, but then unconventional geometrical constraints on compressor and turbine designs are inevitable. If a radial machine were printed through additive manufacturing as a standalone component, the most logical print direction would be from the radial outlet/inlet to the axial inlet/outlet to ease the process and limit the supports, with limited additional constraints compared to traditional manufacturing methods. If the rotor comprising a radial compressor and turbine needs to be printed in one single print, one of the components will be printed in a direction that is not favorable. In the present work, the radial turbine is considered to be printed in the unfavorable direction, namely, from the axial outlet to the radial inlet. These geometrical constraints orient the geometry towards a mixed-flow configuration with a trailing-edge cutback. Such design features reduce the available design space for improvement and will clearly have an unfavorable impact on performance. Therefore, a multi-disciplinary gradient-based adjoint optimization of the mixed-flow turbine is performed, striving to limit the adverse impact on total-to-total efficiency while respecting the mass flow rate and power matching with the upstream compressor. The structural constraint limits the p-Norm von Mises stress to a maximum threshold based on the material yield strength at the operating temperature. The results show that a satisfactory compromise can be found between manufacturability constraints, material limits and aerodynamic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loir et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: