The proposed model enhances power prediction and outlier detection using SCADA data, indicating reliability improvements.
As wind energy adoption grows, ensuring reliable power generation becomes critical. However, its inherent variability, caused by fluctuations in wind speed, direction, and environmental conditions, poses challenges for grid integration and operational planning. To mitigate these issues, researchers have developed various forecasting models and techniques for improving wind power prediction. Wind power forecasting enables more accurate power scheduling, reduces operational costs, and improves grid stability. Datasets derived from wind turbines’ Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) offer high‐resolution and real‐time measurements of critical operational parameters, including wind speed and power output. Outliers in these datasets frequently stem from sensor faults, data transmission issues, extreme environmental conditions, or atypical turbine operations. This makes outlier detection vital for data integrity and effective maintenance planning. This paper proposes a two‐stage model: one stage for outlier detection followed by another stage for power prediction using the Kaggle SCADA dataset. Using One‐Class support vector machine (SVM) for outlier detection marks a significant advancement, as it facilitates the identification of 6588 anomalies without requiring labeled data. By exploiting inherent physical relationships between wind speed and power output, the incorporation of innovative features such as cubic wind speed and residual power enhances the model’s predictive accuracy. The findings underscore the efficacy of the proposed methodology, evidenced by a mean squared error (MSE) of 8809.20 kW, which reflects a significant level of accuracy in forecasting power output. Furthermore, the mean absolute error (MAE) of 63.35 kW which indicates that, on average, the predicted wind power output deviates from the actual output by this amount, reflecting the model’s accuracy in forecasting. The high coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) value of 0.9947 demonstrates an excellent model fit to the observed data, accounting for approximately 99.47% of the variance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: