What type of study is this?

This is a Literature Review study.

September 10, 2025Journal of data protection & privacy.

AI governance and data privacy in cross-border contexts: A comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

ABAhmed Bahgat21c Consultancy (United Kingdom)

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Comparative analysis highlights data privacy and regulatory challenges in AI governance among the US, EU, UAE, and Singapore, indicating a need for harmonised standards.

Key Points

AI governance frameworks show significant discrepancies in addressing privacy concerns across jurisdictions, leading to compliance challenges.
The comparative analysis of AI strategies in the US, EU, Singapore, and UAE emphasized the need for mutual recognition agreements to enhance data privacy.
Regional regulatory frameworks vary, impacting accountability, transparency, and ethical considerations, which are crucial for effective AI implementation.
Matching local frameworks with OECD AI Principles may facilitate the development of more uniform global standards for AI governance.

Cite This Study

Ahmed Bahgat (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c187209b7b07f3a0610eb0 https://doi.org/10.69554/bojl3033

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Comparative analysis highlights data privacy and regulatory challenges in AI governance among the US, EU, UAE, and Singapore, indicating a need for harmonised standards.

AI governance and data privacy in cross-border contexts: A comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

AI governance and data privacy in cross-border contexts: A comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider