This analysis demonstrates the correlation between mechanical properties and microstructures in metals, suggesting improved indentation methodologies for structural integrity assessment.
Local variations in mechanical properties are commonly observed in engineering structures, driven by complex manufacturing histories and harsh service environments. The evaluation of mechanical properties accurately constitutes a fundamental requirement for structural integrity assessment. The Instrumented Indentation Technique (IIT) can play a critical role in the in-site testing of local properties. However, it could be often a challenge to correlate indentation characteristics with uniaxial stress–strain relationships. In this study, we investigated quantitatively the connection between the indentation responses of commonly used metals and their plastic properties using the finite element inversion method. Materials typically exhibit plastic deformation mechanisms characterized by either linear or power-law hardening behaviors. Consequently, conventional prediction methods based on a single constitutive model may no longer be universally applicable. Hence, this study developed methods for acquiring mechanical properties suitable for either the power-law and linear hardening model, or combined, respectively, based on analyses of microstructures of materials exhibiting different hardening behaviors. We proposed a novel integrated IIT incorporating microstructures and material-specific constitutive models. Moreover, the inter-dependency between microstructural evolution and hardening behaviors was systematically investigated. The proposed method was validated on representative engineering steels, including austenitic stainless steel, structural steel, and low-alloy steel. The predicted deviations in yield strength and strain hardening exponent are broadly within 10%, with the maximum error at 12%. This study is expected to provide a fundamental framework for the advancement of IIT and structural integrity assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: