Correlation Between Microstructure and Mechanical Performance of an L-PBF 316L Alloy with an ISE-Free Parameter

The optimization and the engineering development of additive manufacturing (AM) products both require accurate, non-destructive techniques to extract their mechanical performances. The Instrumented Indentation Test (IIT) has such a potential, although it currently lacks standard procedures that are suitable for analyzing materials which are affected by internal residual stress (RS). Additionally, nanoindentation testing suffers from the presence of indentation size effects (ISE), which hamper the possibility of correlating the measured mechanical performance at different indentation depths or peak loads using the standard indentation hardness (HIT) and modulus (EIT). This paper presents a novel IIT methodology that is based on new indentation parameters, namely the loading stiffness rate (LSR) and the rate-derived hardness (HR), which are then used to assign the desired mechanical performances of an L-PBF 316L austenitic stainless-steel alloy obtained via multiload/multiscale IIT strategy. The mean values of LSR, HR, HIT, and EIT on the macroscale were 57.3 ± 1.4 GPa, 2.33 ± 0.059 GPa, 2.41 ± 0.13 GPa, and 201 ± 7.8 GPa, respectively, whereas on the nanoscale they were 56.1 ± 5.1 GPa, 2.30 ± 0.21 GPa, 3.00 ± 0.36 GPa, and 219 ± 24 GPa, respectively. Unlike the standard HIT, the new indentation parameters of the nano- and macro-IITs are within the standard deviation, proving their ISE-free property. The obtained EIT was slightly higher than the reference Young’s modulus (~190 GPa) of the 316L stainless steel. The loading secant stiffness versus depth plot can be used to assess the susceptibility of RS to relax during indentation, which is an important performance factor for the engineering design of AM components. The successful correlation that has been found between electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis (in terms of crystal anisotropy, grain size, and dislocation density) and nanoindentation testing at three subregions of the core zone of the investigated deposit confirms the validity of the proposed methodology. The proposed methodology is a step towards the full determination of the three Ps, that is, process, properties, and performance of advanced AM products.