Cross-sectional study reveals altered auditory processing in migraineurs during the interictal phase, suggesting central processing disorders.
Introduction: Migraine is a complex neurological disorder associated with noise hypersensitivity most evident during attacks (ictal), however persistent during the post-attack (interictal) period as well. Previous studies on cortical auditory potentials have established abnormal sensory processing during the interictal phase but findings related to subcortical (brainstem) involvement remain inconclusive. Aim: To compare Wave I and Wave V amplitude of Auditory Brainstem Evoked Responses (ABER) between migraineurs during the interictal phase and healthy controls at 40-, 50-, and 60-dB above Sensation Level (SL) for both ears. Materials and Methods: The present study was a crosssectional study conducted at the Department of Physiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. Thirty-five diagnosed migraine patients during the interictal phase from the Neurology Outpatient Department (OPD) and 35 age and gender-matched healthy controls were enrolled. The Wave I and V amplitude (µV) were measured, at 40-, 50-, and 60-dB above SL bilaterally, in both groups. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25 was used to analyse the results and an unpaired student’s t-test was employed for comparison in a side-specific manner. The significance level was assigned at a p-value <0.05. Results: The amplitudes of Wave V at 50-db SL (p-value: left ear=0.03, right ear=0.01) and 60-dB SL (p-value: left ear=0.005, right ear=0.013) were significantly higher among migraineurs during interictal phase than their matched controls. The amplitude difference for Wave I was statistically insignificant between the two groups at all recording intensities. At 40 dB SL, both Wave I (p-value: left ear=0.68, right ear=0.63) and Wave V (p-value: left ear=0.30, right ear=0.50) amplitudes did not exhibit any significant difference in results between migraine patients and healthy controls. Conclusion: The subcortical auditory dysfunction is significant for brainstem nuclei beyond the cochlear nucleus (peripheral auditory neurons) at higher intensities, indicating a more noticeable central processing disorder. This could eventually lead to irreversible auditory pathway damage, ABER can be utilised as a tool for early detection and localisation of the insult, providing an opportunity for early intervention and use of prophylactic measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalid et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: