Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retracted article revealed flaws in knowledge discovery methods, indicating issues in peer review processes.
RETRACTION : S.S.L. P. J. Shabu , K. Yadav , E. Kariri , K. K. Gola , M. AnulHaq , A. Kumar , “”, Expert Systems no. 40 , Issue ( 2023 ): . https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12968 . The above article, published online on 1 March 2022 on Wiley Online Library ( wileyonlinelibrary.com ), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor‐in‐Chief, David Camacho and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed after several flaws and inconsistencies between results presented and experimental methods described were found. The conclusions of this article are considered invalid. Further investigation raised concerns regarding the manipulation of the peer review process. The authors have been informed of the retraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: