Analysis reveals demographic shifts in turtles correlated with climatic changes, suggesting vulnerabilities impacting conservation strategies.
Quaternary climatic fluctuations had a substantial influence on ecosystems, species distribution, phenology and genetic diversity, driving extinction, adaptation and demographic shifts during glacial periods and postglacial expansions. Integration of genomic data and environmental niche modelling can provide valuable insights on how organisms responded to past environmental variations and contribute to assessing vulnerability and resilience to ongoing climatic challenges. Among vertebrates, turtles are particularly vulnerable to habitat changes because of distinctive life history traits and the effect of environmental conditions on physiology and survival. We estimated contemporary heterozygosity (H) and effective population size (Ne) using a high-quality chromosome-level reference genome we produced for the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis) and reference genomes and whole genome sequence data available for 21 species of tortoises and freshwater turtles. We implemented environmental niche modelling (ENM) to estimate past habitat dynamics. We found recurrent cycles of population expansion and contraction over the last 10 Mya in all species, with a general pattern of decrease in Ne correlated with temperature reduction after the last interglacial period. No correlation was found between habitat fluctuations during the Quaternary and past Ne. Moreover, neither H nor mean Ne was correlated to threat status as defined by IUCN Red List categories. Our results add to studies on other vertebrates showing the extent to which genetic parameters can aid the assessment of conservation status, and although genomic data may not always be consistent indicators of the level of threat, investigations of which genomic parameters could best represent essential biodiversity variables should be consistently supported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sozzoni et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: