Observational analysis shows durability improvements in concrete masonry units with corn stover, suggesting eco-friendly construction methods.
This study investigates the potential of corn stover, an abundant agricultural byproduct, as a sustainable additive in concrete masonry units (CMUs). Preliminary trials were conducted to determine the optimal fiber length (~3 mm and ~10 mm), fiber content (0%, 1%, 3%, and 5% by volume), and alkalinization method (soaking in 0.5 M NaOH, KOH, or synthetic concrete pore solution) for corn stover fibers (CSFs). The results indicated that short fibers treated with synthetic concrete pore solution yielded the best compressive strength and workability, and were thus selected for the main study. A novel mixture was developed by replacing 10% of cement with corn stover ash (CSA) and incorporating 1% alkaline-treated CSF by volume. The resulting blocks (termed “Corncrete”) were evaluated for mechanical and durability properties, including strength, water absorption, bulk and surface electrical resistivity, rapid chloride permeability (RCPT), and fire resistance. Compared to conventional CMUs, Corncrete exhibited an 11–13% reduction in 28- and 91-day compressive strength, though the difference was statistically insignificant. Physically, Corncrete had a 4.4% lower bulk density and a 7.9% higher total water absorption compared to the control. However, its water absorption rates at early stages were 32% and 48% lower, indicating better resistance to moisture uptake shortly after exposure. Durability tests revealed a 13.7% reduction in chloride ion permeability and a 33% increase in bulk and surface electrical resistivity after 90 days. Fire performance was comparable between the two mixtures, with both displaying ~10.5% mass loss and ~5% residual strength after high-temperature exposure. These findings demonstrate that Corncrete offers balanced mechanical performance and enhanced durability, making it a viable eco-friendly option for non-structural masonry applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shakouri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: