Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental evaluation of lightweight concrete with corn cobaggregate, highlighting mechanical and environmental impacts.
Corn cob, an abundant agricultural waste, was investigated as a partial replacement for conventional coarse aggregate in the production of lightweight concrete. This study evaluated the effects of corn cob aggregate replacement levels (5%, 7.5%, and 10% by volume) and water-cement ratios (0.50–0.60) on concrete performance. Experimental investigations included slump, oven-dry density, compressive strength (CS), split tensile strength (STS), flexural strength (FS), water absorption, and sorptivity tests, while thermal conductivity was estimated using a density-based empirical model. Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to develop predictive models and optimize mechanical performance, and a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment estimated embodied CO₂ emissions. The mixtures exhibited oven-dry densities of 1570–1793 kg/m³ and compressive strengths of 18.3 ± 0.71–22.6 ± 0.98 MPa (mean ± SD, n = 3). Increasing corn cob content reduced density and estimated thermal conductivity but increased water absorption. The RSM models demonstrated strong predictive performance for CS, STS, and FS, with validation errors below 4%. The life-cycle assessment indicated approximately 6% lower embodied CO₂ emissions than those of conventional concrete. These findings demonstrate the potential of corn cob aggregate for producing lightweight concrete with promising mechanical performance and modest environmental benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jewel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: