This approach creates a probability-calibrated screening tool for soil liquefaction in various site conditions, highlighting risk assessment standards.
Soil liquefaction poses a significant risk to foundations during earthquakes, prompting the need for simple, risk-aware screening tools that go beyond single deterministic boundaries. This study creates a probability-calibrated dual-threshold screening rule using a random forest (RF) classifier trained on 208 SPT case histories with quality-based weights (A/B/C = 1.0/0.70/0.40). The model is optimized with random search and calibrated through isotonic regression. Iso-probability contours from 1000 bootstrap samples produce paired thresholds for fines-corrected, overburden-normalized blow count N1,60,CS and normalized cyclic stress ratio CSR7.5,1 at target liquefaction probabilities Pliq = 5%, 20%, 50%, 80%, and 95%, with 90% confidence intervals. On an independent test set (n = 42), the calibrated model achieves AUC = 0.95, F1 = 0.92, and a better Brier score than the uncalibrated RF. The screening rule classifies a site as susceptible when N1,60,CS is at or below and CSR7.5,1 is at or above the probability-specific thresholds. Designed for level ground, free field, and clean-to-silty sand sites, this tool maintains the familiarity of SPT-based charts while making risk assessment transparent and auditable for different facility importance levels. Sensitivity tests show its robustness to reasonable rescaling of quality weights. The framework offers transparent thresholds with uncertainty bands for routine preliminary assessments and to guide the need for more detailed, site-specific analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hani S. Alharbi (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: