Analysis of safety evaluation methods for underground engineering crossings over highways, highlighting risk factors.
To address the lack of unified standards, complex influencing factors, and significant hazards in safety evaluations of underground engineering crossing highways, this study adopting the extension matter-element model for quantitative safety evaluation. First, safety influencing factors across the design, construction, and operation phases were systematically identified for three typical engineering types: pipeline underpasses, tunnel underpasses, and highway underpasses, and a comprehensive evaluation indicator system was established. Then, subjective and objective weights were assigned using the order relation analysis method and the cross-entropy entropy weight method, respectively, and integrated through a distance function. Finally, the safety level of the projects was determined using the extension matter-element model. A case study of a tunnel underpass project in Guangzhou was conducted. The results show a comprehensive correlation degree of 0.13, corresponding to a grade II safety level. Comparison with the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method validated the consistency of the extension matter-element model results and its applicability to underground engineering crossing highways. The adoption of this method facilitates a comprehensive understanding of project safety status, precise identification of high-risk factors, and provides a scientific basis for safety decision-making and management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: