PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics32 citationsOpen Access

Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2025 update

View Full Paper
NBNeerja BhatlaDADaisuke AokiDSDayaNand Sharma

Key Points

  • Vaccination programs for cervical cancer have expanded, with over 140 countries now including HPV vaccination.
  • New screening methods, such as self-sampling and AI integration, enhance early detection of cervical cancer.
  • Minimally invasive surgery and immunotherapy are transforming treatment approaches for invasive cervical cancer.
  • Quality-of-life considerations and palliative care are emphasized in current management strategies.

Abstract

Abstract Since the publication of the 2021 FIGO Cancer Report, there has been further progress in the global effort to attain the WHO goal of cervical cancer elimination using a three‐pillar approach of vaccination, screening, and treatment. The HPV vaccination is now included in the national program of over 140 countries. Two‐dose schedules are being implemented in 80 countries and one‐dose schedules in 60 countries. Screening has seen major advances with the wider implementation of HPV testing, including the option of self‐sampling, portable screening and treatment devices, and the incorporation of artificial intelligence. Diagnostic accuracy is being enhanced with immunohistochemistry and receptor assays. Surgical treatment of invasive cancer is being revolutionized with the possibility of conservative surgery in very early stages, minimizing complications and adverse effects and offering feasibility of fertility sparing. New data on minimally invasive surgery are redefining the role of laparoscopy and robotic surgery in early stages with small tumor size. Sentinel lymph node evaluation is an emerging alternative to complete lymphadenectomy. Immunotherapy has opened up new possibilities for the management of recurrent and metastatic disease. This chapter discusses the management of cervical cancer based on the stage of disease, including attention to palliation and quality‐of‐life issues, with insights into the results from recent landmark trials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bhatla et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1925e9b7b07f3a0617167https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70277
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multi-institutional study of radiation therapy for isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence in uterine cervical carcinoma: 84 subjects of a population of more than 5,0002006 · 94 citations
  2. 2Results from neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery compared to chemoradiation for stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer, EORTC 55994.2019 · 86 citations
  3. 3Anatomic identification and functional outcomes of the nerve sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy2007 · 194 citations
  4. 4Immunogenicity and safety of a new quadrivalent HPV vaccine in girls and boys aged 9–14 years versus an established quadrivalent HPV vaccine in women aged 15–26 years in India: a randomised, active-controlled, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial2023 · 44 citations
  5. 5HPV Screening for Cervical Cancer in Rural India2009 · 1,298 citations