Quantitative analysis reveals the impact of soft and hard skills on career attitudes in Indonesian students, highlighting the role of self-esteem.
Purpose Although experiential learning (EL) is well studied, limited research examines how skill acquisition interacts with psychological mechanisms – such as self-esteem – to shape career attitudes, particularly in large-scale, government-backed programs in the Global South. This study investigates how EL participation develops soft and hard skills and how these skills influence career attitudes through self-esteem. Design/methodology/approach Guided by the experiential learning and attribution theories, this quantitative cross-sectional study analyzed survey data from 18,505 Indonesian university students participating in the Magang dan Studi Independen Bersertifikat (MSIB) program, a nationwide certified internship and independent study initiative. Data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Findings EL participation significantly enhanced both soft and hard skills. These skills positively influenced students’ career attitudes, with self-esteem partially mediating this relationship. Research limitations/implications Incorporating self-esteem into EL models offers more profound insight into the psychological processes that translate skills into career-oriented mindsets in underrepresented contexts. Practical implications Embedding project-based learning, sustained industry engagement and inclusive access to EL programs can strengthen graduates’ technical and interpersonal skills, boost self-confidence and enhance competitiveness in dynamic labor markets. Originality/value This study proposes a novel integrated framework linking skill acquisition and self-esteem to predict career attitudes – an approach largely absent in prior EL research. While most studies focus on the Global North, this work provides rare, large-scale empirical evidence from the Global South, where institutionalized EL opportunities remain limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hendrawan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: