Prospective interventional study compares clinical outcomes in cervical cancer treatment, suggesting toxicity trade-offs with paclitaxel addition.
Background: Cervical cancer remains a major health burden in developing countries. Cisplatin-based chemoradiation is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. However, recurrence and treatment failure remain significant. Paclitaxel, a radiosensitizer, has shown promise when combined with cisplatin. To compare the clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicities of weekly cisplatin alone versus weekly cisplatin with paclitaxel during concurrent chemoradiation in carcinoma cervix. Materials And Methods: This prospective randomized interventional study included 90 patients with histologically confirmed carcinoma cervix (FIGO stage IIA2–IIIC). Patients were randomized into two groups: Arm A (cisplatin 30mg/m2 + paclitaxel 40mg/m2) and Arm B (cisplatin alone 30mg/m2). Both groups received IMRT (50gy in 25 fractions) followed by HDR brachytherapy (21gy in 3fractions). Acute toxicities were assessed weekly; response was evaluated at completion of treatment and at 3 and 6 months using RECISTcriteria. Results: Complete response rates at 6 months were 95% in the cisplatin + paclitaxel group and 93% in the cisplatin group (p = 0.5). The cisplatin + paclitaxel arm had significantly higher rates of Grade II diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, and proctitis (p < 0.05). Hematologic and nephrotoxic profiles were comparable. Conclusion: Adding paclitaxel to weekly cisplatin during chemoradiation for carcinoma cervix improves complete response rates numerically but increases acute toxicity significantly. Further studies are warranted to balance efficacy and tolerability
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rameshwaram et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: