Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis compares gingival index between patients with bands and buccal tubes, indicating better oral health with tubes.
Objectives: To calculate the gingival index of molars with bands before, and at a duration of 3 and 6 months of orthodontic treatment and to compare the scores with the other group which has buccal tubes on the molars. Materials and Methods: 30 patients each in two groups (A and B) by using the random sampling technique. Group Ahad bands cemented on the first molars while Group B had buccal tubes. The variable of gingival Index was then quantified and noted for comparison and analysis. Results: In the banded group when the gingival index was recorded before the start of the orthodontic treatment (T0), the values were low as compared to the index at 3 and 6 months (designated as T1 and T2, respectively). The recorded variable however, gave a decreased value in the bonded group. Banded teeth provided a greater surface for bacterial and foreign body accumulation and lesser surface for maintenance of oral hygiene thus resulting in inflammation around the tooth. Conclusion: When a good oral hygiene is maintained by the patient throughout the fixed orthodontic treatment a better Gingival index with time is seen when buccal tubes are used rather than bands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niazi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: