Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background and Objectives: Conventional stainless-steel orthodontic molar bands may exhibit limited anatomical adaptation, favoring plaque retention and periodontal inflammation. This study aimed to compare the periodontal outcomes of standard bands and CAD/CAM-customized molar bands in adolescents. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled clinical study was conducted in 180 adolescents (mean age: 11.9 years) undergoing fixed orthodontic therapy. Participants were allocated to CAD/CAM-customized bands (n = 90) or standard stainless-steel bands (n = 90). Periodontal parameters—Plaque Control Record (PCR), Bleeding on Probing (BOP), and Periodontal Probing Depth (PPD)—were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Data were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05). Results: Baseline values were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). During follow-up, the CAD/CAM group showed significantly lower PCR, BOP, and PPD values. At 6 months, PCR was 21 ± 8% vs. 42 ± 12%, BOP was 17 ± 6% vs. 40 ± 10%, and PPD was 2.5 ± 0.5 mm vs. 3.1 ± 0.6 mm (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: CAD/CAM-customized molar bands demonstrated superior periodontal performance compared with conventional bands. Improved anatomical adaptation may reduce plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation during orthodontic treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bucur et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: