Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025Public Administration IssuesOpen Access

Current Theoretical Approaches to the Analysis of Exclusive Agreements and Legislative Norms of their Regulation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

НДНаталия Борисовна ДзагуроваСАСветлана АвдашеваNational Research University Higher School of Economics

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Analysis reveals the implications of vertical restrictions in Russian law, contrasting with U.S. and EC practices.

Key Points

  • Proposed changes to vertical restrictions in Russia appear undesirable, as they mirror outdated U.S. legislation.
  • The discussion includes the Robinson-Patman and Miller-Tydings Acts, contrasting them with current antimonopoly practices.
  • Modern institutional approaches to analyzing exclusive agreements extend beyond traditional investment fostering analysis.
  • The significance lies in recognizing that exclusive contracts do not inherently indicate anti-competitive behavior.

Cite This Study

Дзагурова et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c199f49b7b07f3a061c0fbhttps://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2010-0-1-69-88
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ASSESSING VERTICAL AGREEMENTS UNDER THE INDIAN COMPETITION ACT2026
  2. 2The Basis of Legality of Restricting Competition Agreements A Comparative Analytical Study2024
  3. 3Transactions Involving Economic Concentration: the Evolution of Antimonopoly Regulation and Common Torts in Modern Conditions2024
  4. 4Quantum Antitrust – A Unified Exclusionary Abuse Theory2024
  5. 5Legal Regulation of Digital Platforms and Antimonopoly Control: Application Practice2024 · 3 citations