Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Numerical simulation identifies key factors affecting dust removal time in tunnel blasting, highlighting ventilation's role.
To enhance the understanding of dust diffusion laws in tunnel blasting operations of metal mines and determine optimal ventilation dust removal times, a scaled physical model of a metal mine tunneling face under the China Zijin Mining Group was established based on field measurements. Numerical simulation was employed to investigate airflow movement and dust migration in the tunneling roadway, and the fundamental features of airflow field and dust diffusion laws after tunnel blasting operations in the fully mechanized excavation face were revealed. The effects of three main factors included airflow rate (Q), ventilation distance (S), and tunnel length (L) on the dust removal time after tunnel blasting operations were investigated based on the orthogonal design method. Results indicated that reducing the dust concentration in the roadway to 10 mg/m3 required 53 min. The primary factors influencing dust removal time, in order of significance, were determined to be L, Q, and S. The lowest dust concentration occurs when the ventilation distance was 25 m. A predictive model for dust removal time after tunnel blasting operations was developed, establishing the relationship between dust removal time and the three factors as T = 20.7Q−0.73S0.19L0.86. Subsequent on-site validation confirmed the high accuracy of the predictive model, demonstrating its efficacy for practical applications. This study contributes a novel integration of orthogonal experimental design and validated CFD modeling to predict ventilation dust removal time, offering a practical and theoretically grounded approach for tunnel ventilation optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: