A novel model identifies mine inrush water sources, achieving 85.37% accuracy, highlighting key water composition factors.
The prevention and control of mine inrush water has always been a major challenge for safety. By identifying the type of water source and analyzing the real-time changes in water composition, sudden water inrush accidents can be monitored in a timely manner to avoid major accidents. This paper proposes a novel explainable machine learning model for source type identification of mine inrush water. The paper expands the original monitoring system into the XinJi No.2 Mine in Huainan Mining Area. Based on the online water composition data, using the Spearman coefficient formula, it analyzes the water chemical characteristics of different aquifers to extract key discriminant factors. Then, the Conv1D-GRU model was built to deeply connect factors for precise water source identification. The experimental results show an accuracy rate of 85.37%. In addition, focused on the interpretability, the experiment quantified the impact of different features on the model using SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations). It provides new reference for the source type identification of mine inrush water in mine disaster prevention and control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: