Exploratory study finds etoposide-loaded graphene oxide nanogels improve cytotoxicity in cancer cells, suggesting targeted therapy for breast cancer.
Breast cancer represents a significant global health challenge, underscoring the need for innovative therapeutic strategies. This study explores the therapeutic potential of etoposide (ETO)-loaded graphene oxide (GO) nanogels to enhance the efficacy of breast cancer treatments. ETO-GO nanogels were synthesized and characterized using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). Cytotoxicity was evaluated through MTT assays on MCF-7 breast cancer cells and normal HUVEC cells. Apoptosis induction was assessed using DAPI staining, flow cytometry, and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to analyze changes in gene expression. Characterization confirmed the formation of uniform, spherical nanogels with high ETO encapsulation efficiency. EDS and FT-IR analyses validated the successful loading of the drug onto the GO matrix. Cytotoxicity assays revealed a dose-dependent response, with significantly stronger effects observed in MCF-7 cells (20% viability at 100 µg/mL) than HUVEC cells (40% viability at the same concentration), indicating selective cytotoxicity. Apoptosis was verified through DAPI staining, which showed characteristics of nuclear fragmentation, and flow cytometry, identifying 15.35% of the treated cells as apoptotic. qRT-PCR analysis demonstrated an upregulation of pro-apoptotic genes (CASP3, CASP8, CASP9, BAX, PTEN) by as much as 8.3-fold, alongside a marked downregulation of the anti-apoptotic gene Bcl-2, confirming the potent induction of apoptosis by the nanogels. ETO-GO nanogels show promising potential for targeted breast cancer therapy, providing enhanced drug delivery and selective cytotoxicity. These findings warrant further in vivo studies to validate their clinical applicability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asoudeh-Fard et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: