The proposed model describes positron range distributions using Coulomb repulsion, improving PET accuracy.
Introduction: The positron range (PR) effect is a significant factor limiting spatial resolution in positron emission tomography (PET), particularly for high-resolution systems and non-standard isotopes. Objective: This study introduces a novel analytical model to accurately and rapidly describe positron range distributions (PRd) for various PET radioisotopes. Approach: The proposed model explicitly incorporates the Coulomb repulsion effect, the multi-branch nature of certain β + emitters, and the scaling of PR with electronic density. To minimise bias, we used a histogram-free statistical method to derive the cumulative PRd from Monte Carlo (MC) simulated annihilation datasets, avoiding arbitrary histogram binning. A comparative analysis of PR estimates was conducted across three major MC radiation transport algorithm packages: PENELOPE (via PenEasy/PeneloPET), GEANT4 (via GATE), and EGS5 (via PHITS), revealing notable discrepancies between codes, versions, and input configurations, especially at short distances from the source. Main results: The new analytical model demonstrated an excellent reproduction of the simulated data for isotopes including C-11, N-13, O-15, F-18, Cu-64, Ga-68, Rb-82, and I-124, achieving in general coefficients of determination (R 2 ) greater than 0.995 and mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) < 20%. Compared to previous methods, our model provides a more accurate description of PRd at short and long distances and offers improved R 2 values. Significance: This work provides a robust framework for generating accurate annihilation point spread function (aPSF) kernels, facilitating improved PR correction in quantitative Nuclear Medical imaging and supporting research with diverse radioisotopes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paneque-Yunta et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: