Non-randomized trial reveals differences in GDM incidence using oral glucose tests, suggesting one-step may be more effective.
To compare the effect on maternal and neonatal outcomes of 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (75-g OGTT) versus 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) plus 75-g OGTT for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). A non-randomized trial was conducted in a tertiary hospital between January and December 2020. Participants were assigned into the one-step (i.e., 75-g OGTT) and two-step screening (50-g GCT plus 75-g OGTT) groups. Primary outcomes were GDM, hypertensive disorder in pregnancy (HDP), macrosomia, and Cesarean section. 2265 eligible participants were enrolled in the trial, including 1130 in the one-step group and 1135 in the two-step group. GDM was diagnosed in 197 (17.4%) participants in the one-step group and 123 (10.8%) in the two-step group (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.49, 2.54). There was only borderline statistical significance in the difference of HDP between two groups (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.40, 1.01), while all other outcomes showed no statistically significant differences. In pregnant women with high risk factors for GDM (maternal age ≥ 35 years, pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2, multipara, history of GDM, or family history of diabetes), the incidence of GDM was higher (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.19, 2.56) for the one-step versus two step-step screening, while the incidences of HDP (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29, 0.90) and macrosomia (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39, 0.97) were lower. The one-step screening at least performs as well as the two-step screening, potentially more suitable for Chinese pregnant women with high risk factors for GDM. The study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100054505) on Dec 18th, 2021.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: