Mendelian randomization reveals a significant causal relationship with erectile dysfunction, suggesting dietary interventions may be beneficial.
Current research suggests a correlation between erectile dysfunction (ED) and dietary-derived antioxidants. However, the causal relationship between these factors remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the causal relationship between dietary-derived antioxidants and ED using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, based on genetic prediction. This study employed bidirectional two-sample MR analysis to investigate the causal relationship between dietary-derived antioxidants and ED. The primary results were based on inverse variance-weighted analysis with random effects. To assess the robustness and reliability of the findings, sensitivity analyses were conducted, including tests for heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and leave-one-out analysis. Additionally, multivariate MR analysis was performed to further validate the robustness of the results. The inverse variance-weighted results revealed a significant causal relationship between plasma vitamin A levels and ED (odds ratio [OR]: 3.44; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.22-9.68; p=0.019), suggesting that elevated plasma vitamin A levels are a risk factor for ED. A reverse causal relationship was observed between ED and carotene levels (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-1.00; p=0.04). After adjusting for smoking status, the causal association between vitamin A and ED remained significant. The heterogeneity test indicated variability in the relationship between carotene and ED, while the pleiotropy test revealed that the MR-PRESSO p-value for zinc and ED was less than 0.05. This study identifies specific causal relationships between dietary antioxidants and ED, providing a foundation for understanding the pathogenesis of ED, guiding the development of dietary intervention strategies, and informing clinical treatment approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: