Cross-sectional analysis reveals low awareness and negative perceptions of radiotherapy, indicating a need for improved education.
Background: Cancer is a significant public health challenge worldwide, and Saudi Arabia is no exception. The effective treatment of cancer, particularly in its advanced stages, often involves the use of radiotherapy, a critical component of cancer care. The awareness and perceptions of radiotherapy within the Saudi Arabian context are of particular interest. A public understanding of radiotherapy’s benefits, risks, and potential side effects can significantly impact the utilization of this treatment option. Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the current level of awareness and perception regarding radiotherapy as a cancer treatment option among the Saudi Arabian population. Materials and Methods: This study used a cross-sectional method that targeted a sample of the general population of Saudi Arabia. Most of the participants (188; 88.3%) had a negative or neutral perception toward radiotherapy. The data collected were analyzed using the SPSS version 28. Results: The results of the study showed that 48 (23.4%) participants had a low level of awareness regarding radiotherapy as a cancer treatment option, whereas 153 (74.6%) were moderately aware. Only 4 (2.0%) had a high level of awareness regarding radiotherapy. In contrast, only 24 (11.7%) participants reported a positive perception. Only 24 (11.7%) participants had a positive perception. Conclusion: There is a negative perception of radiotherapy in Saudi Arabia and little public awareness of it. The use of radiotherapy is negatively impacted by low levels of awareness and unfavorable perceptions. Hence, there is a need to raise public awareness of radiotherapy and work to enhance public perceptions of the treatment to foster higher acceptability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alswilem et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: