Analysis shows legal classification of financial crimes in state-owned banks, highlighting conflicting views on corruption and banking laws.
To this day, there remains a difference of opinion among legal practitioners regarding whether the assets of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) fall under the regime of state finances. The view that considers the administration of SOEs as part of state finances places financial crimes in state-owned banks under the category of corruption. On the other hand, another view emphasizes the principle of separate legal entity in recognizing state-owned banks as independent legal entities, thereby classifying financial crimes in these banks as banking crimes. This divergence leads to a normative conflict between the Corruption Law and the Banking Law in the legal application to financial crimes committed within state-owned banks. This research aims to understand the rationale behind classifying financial crimes in state-owned banks as acts of corruption, and to examine the application of corruption law to these banks based on the principle of separate legal entity. This study is a normative legal research using statutory and case approaches to provide answers to the normative conflict.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madra et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: