⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

January 1, 2025International Journal of Judicial Law

Responsibilities of Information and Communication Technology Patent Holders in Protecting Consumers who have Been Harmed

Aryawan Arham Zainal Asikin Abdul Atsar

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Financial crimes in state-owned banks are debated as either corruption or banking crimes, revealing legal complexities.
The normative conflict arises from differing views on treating state-owned enterprises under state finance regulations.
Analysis employs statutory and case approaches to explore legal interpretations regarding state-owned bank crimes.
Understanding this issue is crucial for clarifying legal standards around corruption and financial accountability.

Implication

This research examines the classification of financial crimes in state-owned banks under corruption law, highlighting legal entity principles.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Arham et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1ae7054b1d3bfb60e6702 https://doi.org/10.54660/ijjl.2025.4.4.35-41

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Analysis of the Application of Indonesian Corruption Law to State-Owned Banks According to the Principle of Separate Legal Entity2025
2Proof of State Financial Losses in State-Owned Banking Enterprises Related to Corruption Crimes2025
3Normative Conflict Between the State Finance Law and the State-Owned Enterprises Law Regarding the Status of Separated State Assets2025
4Legal Protection for State-Owned Banks as Credit Holders Whose Collateral Objects Have Been Confiscated by the State in Respect of Criminal Acts of Corruption2025
5Analysis Of The State Financial Losses To Subsidiaries Of State-Owned Enterprises In Terms Of Business Judgment Rules2024 · 1 citations