Cross-sectional study finds high MRSA prevalence and clindamycin resistance in strains, highlighting the need for routine screening.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a major cause of hospital-acquired infections, with increasing concerns over resistance to clindamycin due to inducible mechanisms. Phenotypic detection of such resistance is critical for appropriate antibiotic therapy. Objectives: To determine the prevalence of MRSA and inducible clindamycin resistance among clinical isolates of S. aureus and to compare resistance patterns between MRSA and MSSA strains in a tertiary care setting. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted over eight months in a tertiary care hospital in Western India. A total of 100 S. aureus isolates from various clinical specimens were identified and tested for antibiotic susceptibility using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. MRSA detection was performed using the cefoxitin disc method, and erythromycin-resistant isolates were subjected to D-testing to detect inducible clindamycin resistance. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and odds ratios. Results: MRSA was identified in 38% of isolates. Inducible clindamycin resistance (iMLSB) was detected in 30.4% of erythromycin-resistant isolates, with cMLSB in 10.7%, and MS phenotype in 26.8%. Constitutive resistance was exclusively observed in MRSA (p = 0.02). Resistance to clindamycin, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, and gentamicin was significantly higher in MRSA compared to MSSA (p < 0.001). All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid. Conclusion: A high prevalence of MRSA and inducible clindamycin resistance underscores the necessity of routine phenotypic screening, particularly the D-test, for guiding effective antibiotic therapy. These findings support the need for ongoing surveillance and robust antimicrobial stewardship programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dubey et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: