This article explores quality management systems in cement production, indicating foreign models and practices might enhance local effectiveness.
This article analyzes the issue of the organization of a quality management system in the cement production industry from a scientific and practical point of view. International practice, including quality management models introduced in the countries of Japan, Germany, China, the United States and South Korea, have been analyzed and their advantages and disadvantages have been studied. Approaches such as ISO 9001, Total Quality Management (TQM), Six Sigma, Lean Production, and Kaizen are cited based on numerical and tabular analyses of the extent to which the cement industry is effective. The article emphasized the application of foreign experience to industrial enterprises of Uzbekistan, personnel qualifications, internal control mechanisms and the importance of digitization technologies. Also, existing scientific sources have been critically analyzed and practice-oriented proposals have been developed. Based on these analyses, the need to create a hybrid quality management model for local cement businesses is scientifically based.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashurova Zarina Olimjonovna (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: