Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Policy commentary highlights challenges in cost-effectiveness analysis of antimicrobial resistance campaigns, suggesting critical considerations for policy makers.
To provide overview and understanding of the current challenges in assessing the cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) campaigns and highlight the main considerations for policy makers when evaluating existing and future evidence to inform decision making. Policy commentary. A rapid review of cost-effectiveness analyses evaluating public AMR campaigns highlighted significant challenges with existing methodologies which were reviewed extensively in further literature searches to inform overview and commentary. Longstanding challenges in measuring clinical outcomes for use in economic evaluations and the methodologies available to health economists to evaluate public health campaigns were identified: Identifying and measuring appropriate outcomes, including broader societal impacts, capturing relevant outcomes which result over longer timescales, and accounting for the costs of AMR. These remain significant obstacles in assessing the true cost-effectiveness of interventions. Little methodological progress has been made in this area over the past 20 years, leaving policy makers in a difficult conundrum when justifying future investment in public campaigns to combat AMR. Evidence of high societal value placed on such interventions suggests future work to establish the cost-effectiveness of public AMR campaigns and support policy making are essential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jordan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: