Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals significant trends in car-t therapy research in oncology, suggesting evolving priorities in treatment approaches.
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy is a groundbreaking, personalized immunotherapy that genetically engineers patient or donor-derived T cells to recognize and eliminate cancer cells. The U.S FDA has approved six CAR-T cell products in the past decade. Given their clinical success and scientific novelty, this study aimed to map the research landscape surrounding the FDA-approved CAR-T cell therapies using bibliometric and knowledge mapping analysis. A comprehensive title/abstract search was conducted in Scopus database for documents published between 2015 and 2024. The search terms included generic, trade, and abbreviated names of all FDA-approved CAR-T cell products. Bibliometric indicators including average annual growth rate, citation impact, key contributors, authorship pattern, and international collaboration were assessed. Visualization maps of co-authorship and keyword co-occurrence were generated using VOSviewer. A total of 1163 documents were retrieved, with an average annual growth rate of 63.4%. Tisa-cel and axi-cel dominated the literature with 51.7% (n = 601) and 554 (47.6%) publications respectively. Ide-cel appeared in 152 (13.1%) publications, liso-cel in 125 (10.7%), and cilta-cel in 120 (10.3%). Brexu-cel was the least represented with 106 (9.1%) publications. The retrieved publications received 57,097 citations (mean = 49.1 citations per article; H-index = 103). Hematology and oncology-related journals were most prolific. The United States led global research output with 694 (59.7%) publications. Research output from European countries showed strong dependence on U.S.-based partnerships. Institutionally, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, with 132 publications, was the leading institutions, followed by Moffitt Cancer Centre, and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Authorship analysis revealed significant collaborative efforts, averaging 10.9 authors per article. Co-authorship map revealed academia-industry partnership. Temporal analysis of keywords revealed an evolution from CD19 target research (tisa-cel and axi-cel) to BCMA focused therapies (ide-cel and celta-cel). Thematic analysis showed four research themes: (1) molecular, therapeutic, and regulatory development of CAR-T constructs; (2) outcome of clinical trials; (3) economic and policy dimension of CAR-T therapy; and (4) treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. This study offers a translationally relevant perspective for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers, and underscores the evolving priorities in therapeutic development, access, and sustainability in precision oncology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moutaz W Sweileh (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: