Nonrandomized analysis reports lasting impacts on intraocular pressure and medication use in patients with glaucoma, indicating long-term management feasibility.
Intraocular implantation of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt has been shown to be effective in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). A single-site, open-label study in the Dominican Republic (NCT00772330) found that MicroShunt implantation resulted in sustained reductions in mean IOP and glaucoma medications after 1, 3 and 5 years, with no long-term sight-threatening adverse events (AEs) and with low rates of post-operative interventions. The present study reports results in these patients after 10 years. The original trial included patients aged 18–85 years with POAG inadequately controlled on maximum tolerated medical therapy, with medicated IOP ranging from 18–40 mmHg, who underwent monocular MicroShunt implantation. Patients who remained in this trial after 10 years, were included. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of all device- and/or procedure-related AEs. Secondary endpoints included the mean IOP and mean reduction in IOP from baseline, the mean number of glaucoma medications and changes in visual field. Of the 23 patients initially enrolled in this trial, nine remained after 10 years. Mean medicated IOP in operated eyes was lower at 10 years than at baseline, with mean percent reductions in IOP being greater in operated than in non-operated eyes throughout the 10-year period. Glaucoma medication use returned to baseline after 10 years, with none of the nine patients being medication-free. Relative to endothelial cell counts at 5 years, endothelial cell counts at 10 years showed a greater decrease in non- operated than in operated eyes. The percentages of eyes with bullae began to decrease after 1 year, with 67% of eyes having bullae after 10 years. The mean deviation of change in visual field was stable for 36 months, but showed increasing variability thereafter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juan Batlle (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: