Experimental study demonstrates improved stress distribution and load reduction with geogrid reinforcement in retaining walls.
Conventional cast-in-place counterfort retaining walls, while widely used to support the fill body in geotechnical engineering cases, suffer from extended construction cycles and environmental impacts that constrain their usage more widely. In this study, in order to overcome these limitations, the performance of two types of innovative prefabricated counterfort retaining wall system—a monolithic design and a modular design—was investigated through physical modeling. The results reveal that failure mechanisms are fundamentally governed by the distribution of stress at the connection interfaces. The monolithic system, with fewer connections, concentrates stress and is more vulnerable to cracking at the primary joints. In contrast, the modular system disperses loads across numerous connections, reducing localized stress. Critically, this analysis identified a construction-dependent failure mode: incomplete contact between the foundation and the base slab induces severe bending moments that can lead to catastrophic failure. Furthermore, this study shows that complex stress states due to backfill failure can induce detrimental tensile forces on the wall structure. To address this, a composite soil material–wall structure system incorporating geogrid reinforcement was developed. This system significantly enhances the backfill’s bearing capacity and mitigates adverse loading. Based on the comprehensive analysis of settlement and structural performance, the optimal configuration involves concentrating geogrid layers in the upper third of section of the backfill, with sparser distribution below.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: